/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25122137/236836_Infrastructure_SPACE_LASER_Sisi_Kim.jpg?w=1200&resize=1200,628&ssl=1 "Space lasers!")
It’s easy to take communication infrastructure for granted, right up until the moment you need to make an important call and don’t have cell service. But if you think that’s bad on the ground, then imagine how much worse the problem is in space.
NASA spacecraft communicate with engineers and scientists on Earth primarily using a system called the Deep Space Network, or DSN, which, for the past 60 years, has been responsible for sending vital instructions to spacecraft and receiving precious data back from them.
This network is aging, however, with decades-old hardware that’s struggling to carry an ever-increasing load. A growing number of missions is pushing the network to its limits, and already, thousands of hours of science observations are being lost during big missions like Artemis I.
There’s no way for the current system of radio communications to meet the needs of NASA’s ambitious future plans, like sending out more deep space missions and putting humans on the Moon. If we want reliable, high-bandwidth communications to and from space to enable future exploration, experts say we need something new. It’s time to turn to lasers.
The DSN hardware consists of multiple dishes, or antennas, located at three sites around the globe in Goldstone, California; Madrid, Spain; and Canberra, Australia. These sites were chosen so that however the Earth rotates relative to a spacecraft in deep space, at least one site will be able to pick up its communications.
It’s time to turn to lasers
The DSN is currently used by more than 40 missions, not only from NASA but also from international partners like the European and South Korean space agencies. The network carries data from spacecraft as distant as the Voyager probes, currently exploring interstellar space, and the New Horizons mission, which is out beyond the orbit of Pluto. It also includes major science missions like the Mars rovers Perseverance and Curiosity and even telescopes like the James Webb Space Telescope.
You can get a feel for how many missions are passing data back and forth from Earth on the DSN by looking at the DSN Now tool, which shows which antennas are receiving data from which missions in real time. New instruments are hoovering up more data than ever before: James Webb, for example, collects and transmits data at around 50 times the rate of the older Hubble Space Telescope. All of that data needs to be transmitted back to Earth, and it’s putting a strain on the system.
In fact, it’s fair to say that it’s too much data for the network to handle. The DSN is oversubscribed, meaning more missions need to use it than can be accommodated, with the demand from space missions being as much as 40 percent above what the network can provide. NASA officials and committee members have described reaching a “critical point” and a “five-alarm fire bell.”
This isn’t a problem with an easy solution. An audit of the DSN performed by the NASA Office of Inspector General earlier this year found that demand would reach up to 50 percent higher than could be supplied by the 2030s.
The DSN is oversubscribed
In a recent meeting of the Space Studies Board on November 14th, the NASA official who oversees the agency’s space communications and navigation program, Jeff Volosin, acknowledged the challenges of balancing competing needs on the DSN, such as trying to maintain data communications from science missions like James Webb during the Artemis I mission.
“The need to cover that Artemis mission with our 34-meter [deep space] antennas did affect our ability to do science mission support at the same time,” Volosin said. That effectively means lost time on missions like Webb, with hours of observations that can’t be made because the data can’t be transmitted.
The problem is only going to get worse in the future, as NASA ramps up its plans for missions to the Moon, including sending crew there. The DSN is dealing with a declining budget and, looking ahead to future lunar missions over the next 10 to 15 years, “There’s going to be a challenge where we’re not always going to have capacity,” Volosin said.
There’s also the fact that much of the DSN hardware, some of which was built in the 1960s, is aging and has suffered from years of deferred maintenance. But experts argue that the DSN needs to be recognized as critical infrastructure, without which space exploration as we know it would be impossible.
“It’s a jewel of humanity,” said Jason Mitchell, program executive for NASA’s Space Communications and Navigation (SCaN) program. “You think about what we have been able to accomplish and develop in terms of understanding of our universe and our place in it — it is undeniably a critical element in that. It’s difficult for me to articulate how important I think this is as an asset to humanity.”
a:hover]:shadow-highlight-franklin dark:[&>a:hover]:shadow-highlight-franklin [&>a]:shadow-underline-black dark:[&>a]:shadow-underline-white”>Increasing communications capacity
There is hope that some of these capacity issues could be alleviated by making use of commercial operations offering communications services, with NASA exploring the possibility of using options like SpaceX’s Starlink network for low Earth orbit communications (though it’s not certain how long the government will maintain positive relations with Elon Musk’s SpaceX given his antisemitism).
For deep space missions, however, government-run facilities are the only realistic option. NASA is building a lunar communication system called Lunar Exploration Ground Sites, or LEGS, consisting of 18-meter antennas for use in Moon missions. And the DSN is in the process of upgrading to six 34-meter antennas, with two at each of the three sites, although these upgrades are currently several years behind the initial schedule.
There are also some clever ways of making the most of the current DSN system. With multiple Mars missions, for example, it’s possible to have three or four different rovers or orbiters transmitting data that is received by just one antenna because each mission operates on its own channel. There are also experiments within the DSN into offloading tasks like GPS and timing, which could help reduce the overall load on the network.
In the longer term, though, higher demands are going to require a new approach to communications generally. On a tight budget, it’s not easy to find the money for this kind of experimentation. But it’s necessary for supporting the long-term operations of the agency. “It’s a challenge because you’re balancing your dollar needs of today against the potential dollar needs for the future,” Mitchell said.
To get more out of a communications system, you need to squeeze more bandwidth into a signal, and the way to do that is to operate at a higher frequency. That’s the idea of using laser communications, also known as optical communications, in place of radio waves. These transmit in the near-infrared portion of the electromagnetic spectrum, passing along data that is encoded into particles of light, called photons. That can increase the bandwidth available by an order of magnitude compared to using radio.
This would help ease the strain on the DSN to convey data for more missions. “Really the only way, the nearest-term capability that we have to meet this capacity that’s currently being fielded, is optical,” Mitchell said. “Even when you think about the peak scenarios where you have a high-priority mission set in the same part of the sky, it’s less of a burden because now you can get that same amount of data down in less time and still service all those missions.”
Laser communication has different hardware requirements from radio communication, though, so in the last decade, NASA has begun to develop demonstration systems that can test out this new capability. For the DSN, the ideal scenario is to upgrade the existing hardware to handle both radio and laser as required.
“We have these big 34-meter antennas for the DSN, and they already have all the capabilities to move and point. We’ve got really accurate pointing. So our goal is to add the capabilities of optical so we can do simultaneous RF [radio frequency] and optical comm,” Amy Smith, the deputy manager for the DSN at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, said.
The current DSN infrastructure already exists for functions like moving the antennas and data routing. That could make adapting existing hardware to use optical rather than building new facilities considerably cheaper. “We think it’s maybe half the cost of building a standalone optical receiver,” Smith said.
Adapting an antenna designed for radio for optical use isn’t as simple as slapping a new box onto a big dish, though. The planned upgrades would work by adding a series of actuated glass mirrors to the center of an antenna, which can move to make the tiny accurate adjustments necessary for laser communications.
These mirrors bounce the incoming light toward the top of the antenna, called the apex, into a receiver from which the signal can be routed through the pedestal of the dish and onto its destination.
The additional hardware for laser comms would eat up some of the dish currently dedicated to radio comms but only a small amount right in the center — so there is a small impact on the use of that antenna for radio.
But the big advantage of this hybrid approach is that it allows the use of radio and laser comms simultaneously. “Having the capability of both gives you one pass, where you could be talking with RF on your uplink, and then getting a high-rate science downlink at the same time with just a single antenna,” Smith explained.
These upgrades would allow a significant leap in communications bandwidth for the network. Using optical over radio would allow around 60 times more data to be transferred from the distance of Mars. That would be hugely preferable for future crewed missions, which might want to send back video of astronauts at work similar to the footage seen from the International Space Station as well as for science missions with increasingly complex instruments.
Laser communications are frequently used and well understood on Earth and in near-Earth scenarios — and theoretically, the systems should be perfectly capable of operating in deep space as well. But theory is one thing, and getting a fully reliable system up and in use is quite another.
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/25467384/Main_blog_post_infographic.jpg?w=100&resize=100,100&ssl=1 "Google Gemini is here for Chromebook Plus")